Employment programs required by federal statutes and regulations designed to remedy discriminatory practices in hiring minority group members; i. Factors considered are race, color, sex, creed, and age. The idea of affirmative action was foreshadowed as early as the Reconstruction Era, which followed the U. Civil War. When that conflict ended, the former slave population throughout the South owned virtually nothing and had only a limited set of skills with which they could make a living. To help these newly emancipated citizens sustain a minimal economic base, the victorious General William T. Sherman proposed to divide up the land and goods from the sizable plantations of southeastern Georgia that were under his command and grant to each family of color "40 acres and a mule. Nearly a century later, this idea of assisting whole classes of individuals to gain access to the goods of U. These decisions and initiatives came to be known as affirmative action. The term itself refers to both mandatory and voluntary programs intended to affirm the civil rights of designated classes of individuals by taking positive action to protect them from, in the words of Justice william j. EEOC , U. A law school, for example, might voluntarily take affirmative action to find and admit qualified students of color. An employer might recruit qualified women where only men have worked before, such as businesses that operate heavy equipment. Affirmative action developed during the four decades following the decision in brown v. In Brown , the Supreme Court held that public school Segregation of children by race denied minority children equal educational opportunities, rejecting the doctrine of "separate but equal" in the public education context. During the s and early s, the Civil Rights Movement as well as the Vietnam War inspired members of minorities and women to advocate collectively for increased equality and opportunity within U. These groups appealed for equal rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, and they sought opportunity in the public arenas of education and employment. In many ways, they were successful. As affirmative action grew, however, it drew increasing criticism, often from men and whites, who opposed what they viewed as "reverse discrimination. While the Brown decision declared segregated schools unlawful, it did not create affirmative action to remedy discriminatory practices. A decade after Brown , little had changed to integrate the nation's schools. The Court acted ahead of business executives and legislatures when it mandated, in Green v. County School Board , U. There followed the adoption of an array of devices such as redistricting, majority-to-minority transfers, school pairings, magnet schools, busing, new construction, and abandonment of all-black schools. The first major legal setback for voluntary affirmation action was regents of the university of california v. The plan, which had set aside 16 places for minority applicants, was challenged by white applicant Allan Bakke, who had been refused admission even though he had higher test scores than some of the minority applicants. The Court held that by setting aside a specific number, or quota, of places by race, the school had violated Bakke's civil rights. By denying the "set-aside" practice of an affirmative action plan, the decision seemed to threaten the principle underlying affirmative action as well. The following year, however, the Court found in united steelworkers v. Writing for the plurality, Justice Brennan said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of does not prohibit courts from ordering "affirmative race-conscious relief as a remedy for past discrimination" in appropriate circumstances. Such circumstances might include "where an employer or Labor Union has engaged in persistent or egregious discrimination, or where necessary to dissipate the lingering effect of pervasive discrimination. The Court later found, in City of Richmondv. Croson Co. The plan, which required 30 percent of all subcontracts to be awarded to minority-owned companies, was struck down because this municipality had failed to show compelling state interest for such a measure. The Court applied the compelling interest test after holding that race-based action by state and local government was subject to Strict Scrutiny. The Court extended this to the federal government in Adarand Constructors, Inc. Pena , S. In Johnson v. Transportation Agency , U. The Court held that a "manifest imbalance" existed in this workforce because of an under representation of women, and that the employer had acted properly in using a "moderate, flexible, case-by-case approach to effecting a gradual improvement in the representation of minorities and women.
An Analytical Review Of The Current Literature Analysis Of Maya Angelou S A Great My Father Has The Most Interesting Story Sexual Child Abuse Effects On Children Calveta Everyday Use Essay Should Sex Offenders Be Committed Using Social Sight And Blindness In Shakespeares King Lear The Illegal Situation America Is The Land The Tempest By William Shakespeare And Directed Persuasive Essay On The Problems Of A Marxism And Communism The Holocaust And The Civil War Character Analysis The Catcher In The Rye Costco Is A Membership Warehouse Club A Streetcar Named Desire Essay We Spend A Third Of Our Lives Questions On The Fourth Amendment The Green Revolution What Positive And Negative The Political Spectrum Of The United States The Laws Of The Commonwealth Death Of A Parent The Acquired Rights Directive 77 187 Eec Should Retail Investors Invest In Index Tracker Rousseaus Second Discourse Global Pharmaceutical Industry Analysis Information On The Internet Of A Regular Social Marginalization Mr Pilazzio And Mrs Walden V Encinitas Climate Change Caused By Humans Cooperative Learning The Positive Effects Of Cooperative The Impact Of Scientific Management On Non The Philippine PesoвЂљГ„Г®Us Dollar Exchange Rate The Catapulting Though Time Physics Poetry Analysis Of The Psalm Of Life